Site Loader

We are are resource to assist Navy Sailors in writing FITREPs, EVALs, CHIEFEVALs, awards, and Officer FITREP Examples British Navy FITREP Examples. the Navy Chief’s Mess and accepted across the Fleet. ▫ Commanding Officers evaluate Chiefs using an E-7 to O-6 Fitrep which does not reflect. My Intent of this website is to be a one stop shop for all Navy Evaluations and Awards. I have tried to compile the best Navy Evaluations, Navy FITREPS and.

Author: Daigis Jurr
Country: Austria
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Photos
Published (Last): 19 July 2007
Pages: 110
PDF File Size: 3.75 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.98 Mb
ISBN: 871-8-59263-849-5
Downloads: 28679
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tygoll

When you realize that the success of the Navy mission depends on putting the right people in the right job, you can grasp the importance of the annual evaluation. The information contained in this critical document is used to select candidates for the Navy’s most challenging and key billets. As you fitre in rank, the dpo of your annual evaluation only increases and it’s vitally important that it be completed accurately. Squeezing a year’s performance into only 18 lines is a challenge.

And when you consider the impact that this single document fifrep, you realize how important it is to make every single word count. The most efficient way to get started is to brainstorm first.

List all the ratee’s accomplishments on a separate sheet of paper. Write down everything that might qualify as an accomplishment that occurred during the reporting period: Then when you have all the information on paper, you can start sorting and prioritizing the information. Below is a discussion on the Block 41, Comments on Performance block, and general guidance on how to record your fjtrep. The Comments on Performance block has three main divisions which vary somewhat in size as needed: The goal of the FitRep is to accurately and completely describe a Sailor’s performance.

And that can’t be done by simply creating a laundry list of achievements. Listing noteworthy accomplishments does provide some insight into a manager’s abilities but it doesn’t provide the whole picture. Merely listing achievements doesn’t give any indication as to what kind of leader or gitrep the person might be.

A Seaman might have the best accomplishments in the fleet but be an unbearable pain in the ass and impossible to work with. He or she might be iftrep best at fixing a broken radio but the absolute worst at sharing experience or getting along with others. And those social qualities are equally as important as a person’s technical skills.

Navy Writer

So, in addition to describing a person’s professional and technical skills, we need a way to inform the report’s reader on the subject’s social skills, his integrity, his character, his loyalty and other qualities which are not apparent when merely reading a list of accomplishments. The introduction, the first two or three lines in the Comments on Performance block, is where this is done. These are the only lines where descriptive, subjective terms and adjectives are tolerated and even encouraged.

As stated above, the goal of the ChiefEval is to accurately and fully describe a Sailor’s performance. While the introduction provides information on the subject’s personality and character, most of the Comments on Performance block is reserved for recording the subject’s accomplishments during the reporting period.

A list of accomplishments provide a factual window onto a person’s abilities, skills, and productivity. They are an indication of the subject’s ability to learn, progress, manage, and lead.

The number of lines devoted to accomplishments compared to the number of lines set aside for the introduction give you an idea of their importance to the Navy.


Technical and professional qualities are critically important for advancement, fully as important as a person’s social and leadership skills!

Just as the introductory lines were a masterpiece of concise expression, the summary line s must sum up the impression the writer is trying to convey. Senior Chief Proctor is a strong deck-plate leader with a proven record of achievement.

PRT not conducted due to operational commitments. Extremely influential, he is staunchly dedicated to command goals and challenges. Selflessly devoted time and effort to encourage and mentor junior Sailors throughout the department. His inspirational leadership has yielded an unprecedented eight Petty Officer advancements in an fitrel advancement environment. Managed fitrpe execution of over mishap-free refueling evolutions and the safe transfer of more thangallons of aviation fuel in support of WASP’s Southern Partnership Station surge deployment.

His leadership and technical expertise have contributed to an increase in WASP’s combat readiness and resulted in lasting improvements to the safe operation and maintenance of the Aviation Fuels System.

If you can select only one Senior Chief make it Senior Heider. His commitment to mission and crew is unwavering. Performance equal to a Master Chief in every way. Actively involved in his Sailor’s development. One of the most widely respected leaders onboard. Fitrsp Liban is an absolute superstar, flourishing in a challenging, visible, and pressure filled environment. Flawlessly managed 18 workcenters through arduous Iftrep Training Cycle with consistent high results. Exceptional management and administrative oversight of the department’s 3M Program, ensuring material readiness of all engineering spaces.

Actively involved in a 65 member Mess and Induction activities. Senior Chief Smith’s integrity, loyalty, and unwavering professionalism uniquely qualify him to be a Master Chief in today’s Navy. He is an MP only because of time onboard and restrictions placed on me by the reporting system. pco

I unequivocally trust his sound, expert judgment in the defense of this warship and crew. Led 35 member CAT in surveying overall command climate. He is only MP because of the restrictions placed on me by the report system, an EP in all other circumstances. Led his troops in the identification and correction of discrepancies across 95 spaces.

Responsible for the training and qualification of 83 duty section personnel and 33 Repair 2F personnel ensuring all qualifications were met. PRT not completed due to operational commitments. Served as the ship’s Senior Enlisted Watch Officer. Additionally, only Chief qualified as a CDO. Overall the best I have, I would take him above some of my more senior Department Heads. Knowledgeable, resourceful, and extremely versatile, performing as an experienced Master Chief.

Morale, esprit de corps, pride, and most importantly, operational successes are a result of this leader. Volunteered to coach 18 Sailors from seven commands to win the “Partnership Through Sports” basketball tournament in Halifax, Nova Scotia.

PRT not conducted due to operational commitment. Senior Chief Burton is a true professional and epitomizes Naval leadership. Verified ability of training teams to self assess. Ensured 1, WASP personnel and embarked staffs were kept connected. Active member within the Chief’s Mess during transition season. He masterfully integrated 22 Master-at-Arms and TAD ship crewmembers to create a highly productive anti-terrorism team.

Only enlisted qualified as a Antiterrorism Tactical Watch Officer onboard. His tireless efforts in properly training the crew dramatically resulted in a stronger security firep force and alleviated watchbill concerns.

Responsible for the revision of several command instructions. C;o Chief Dupre continues to impress with his high level of technical expertise and dedication to the command’s success.


My 1 P and MP by all other accounts, only the restrictions of the reporting system prevent me from making him an MP. Consistently displays exemplary leadership and professionalism. As Section Leader, flawlessly managed duty section through ever changing watchbill requirements and personnel qualifications.

New in All new evals and fitreps

An energetic Navy Counselor and exemplary team player who in a short time has made significant impact to the CPO Mess, Exec Department, and the crew of over 1, Sailors he personally takes care of! ITCS Jackson is a seasoned leader and administrator. He has proven that he can excel in any position. Master Chief Valente has set unbelievable standards across the Norfolk Waterfront! Led 10 CPOs and 55 personnel in the daily operation of a high tempo department, providing absolute best customer service to the crew of over 1, personnel in areas of career counseling, pay, legal advice, and MWR resulting in two CPOs, two SOQs, and one JSOQ selection during reporting period.

Although not within standards, this Master Chief quickly set personal goals, made significant changes in his culture of fitness. Master Chief Harding is a superb leader who fosters a healthy, positive work environment, maximizing the professional development of the Sailors assigned.

Led Deck Department through final 1. His experience, mentorship, and vision led to 15 Seamen being rated and advancement of two BM2s.

Additionally, he managed six mishap-free anchoring evolutions, multiple small boat operations, and six Underway Replenishments, receiving over 1 million gallons of fuel and 40 pallets of stores. He continues to actively instill pride, professionalism and responsibility with Sailors and their careers to mold them into the next generation of leaders. There is no equal! Even in a rigorous operational environment and ever-ending assault on ship’s manpower, nothing has stopped this aggressive deckplate leader!

There is not enough room on this evaluation to describe CMC Jones’ impact to this ship. His tireless efforts, coupled with the crew’s renewed focus resulted in WASP receiving a passing score of Known as ship’s historian for outstanding written and spoken pieces on such topics as Naval Birthday and Bicentennial Celebration of the War of Second PFA failure in a four year period.

His stellar performance significantly instilled a new professional culture onboard WASP! Master Chief Gardner has the presence, knowledge, and commitment to serve at the command level. FCCM Hallissy combines vast operational experience, managerial skills, and command vision. Turned failing department into an operationally competent, technically responsive combat team! Designed and built technically and tactically challenging CSTT scenarios using real-world intel cueing.

Navy ChiefEval and FITREP Examples

These scenarios allowed WASP to complete the Basic Phase ahead of schedule with better than expected results, while improving warfighting readiness. Quickly established a culture of excellence amongst shipboard maintainers, repairing equipment that in some cases had not been operational fpo three years. Continues to revitalize programs to increase material and operational fihrep, enhancing warfighting prowess. His mentorship and guidance are without equal.

Driving force behind AIMD’s success during Aviation Maintenance Inspection, resulting in “32 of 35” programs being graded as “On Track” and 58 of 59 practical drills graded satisfactory with no major discrepancies.

Guided his department in completion of 9, maintenance and calibration actions while clearing material procurement obstacles and manning shortfalls.